Chinés : Diferéncia entre lei versions

Chinés
	汉语 — 汉语 — 汉语 — 漢語 — 漢語 — 中文
Locutors	mai d'1,3 miliard de
Classament	1ena
Tipologia	SVO + SOV [1]
Classificacion lingüistica	Chinés
Estatut oficial
Oficial de	China, Taiwan, Singapor
Còdis lingüistics
ISO 639-1	zh
ISO 639-2	chi zho
ISO 639-3	zho
ISO 639-5	zhx
Ethnologue	zho
Glottolog	sini1245
ASCL	71
Linguist List	chin
IETF	zh
Mòstra
	Article primièr de la Declaracion dels Dreches Umans (vejatz lo tèxt en occitan); ; 第一条; ; 人人生而自由, 在尊严和权利上一律平等。他们赋有理性和良心, 并应以兄弟关系的精神相对待。

Navigar dins l'istoric

Diferéncia seguenta →

Contengut suprimit Contengut apondut

VisualWikitext

En linha

Version del 12 decembre de 2011 a 09.30

Lo chinés o las lengas siniticas (中国语文, Zhōnggúo yǔwén o 中文, Zhōngwén) es una familha de lengas mutualament compreensiblas ^[1] a de grases divèrses.

A l'origina son las lengas indigènas parladas pels chineses Han en China, e constituís una de las doas brancas de la familha de las lengas sinotibetanas. Aperaquí un cinquen de la populacion mondiala, siá mai d'un miliard de personas, parlan una forma de chinés coma lenga mairala. L'identificacion de las varietats de chinés coma "dialèctes" e non pas "lengas" es considerada inapropriada per d'unes lingüistas e sinologistas.^[2]

Lo chinés parlat se destria per un naut nivèl de diversitat intèrna, e mai que totas las varietats de chinés sián tonalas e analiticas.

Diferentas lengas siniticas

Gan Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei gan
Hakka Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei hak
Huizhou Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei czh
Jinyu Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei cjy
Literary Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei lzh
Mandarin Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei cmn
Min Bei Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei mnp
Min Dong Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei cdo
Min Nan Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei nan
Min Zhong Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei czo
Pu-Xian Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei cpx
Wu Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei wuu
Xiang Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei hsn
Yue Chinese, lo còde ISO 639 qu'ei [[yue]

Referéncias

↑
*David Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) , p. 312. “The mutual unintelligibility of the varieties is the main ground for referring to them as separate languages.”
- Charles N. Li, Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar (1989), p 2. “The Chinese language family is genetically classified as an independent branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family.”
- Jerry Norman. Chinese (1988), p.1. “The modern Chinese dialects are really more like a family of language.
- John DeFrancis. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy (1984), p.56. "To call Chinese a single language composed of dialects with varying degrees of difference is to mislead by minimizing disparities that according to Chao are as great as those between English and Dutch. To call Chinese a family of languages is to suggest extralinguistic differences that in fact do not exist and to overlook the unique linguistic situation that exists in China."
↑ Mair, Victor H. (1991). What Is a Chinese "Dialect/Topolect"? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic Terms (PDF).

Ligams intèrnes

Mandarin estandard

Ligams extèrnes

Lexicòt occitan-chinés (un drin mensh de 500 arreviradas)

Portal de las lengas

Modèl:Ligam AdQ

[1] *David Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) , p. 312. “The mutual unintelligibility of the varieties is the main ground for referring to them as separate languages.”
Charles N. Li, Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar (1989), p 2. “The Chinese language family is genetically classified as an independent branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family.”

Jerry Norman. Chinese (1988), p.1. “The modern Chinese dialects are really more like a family of language.

John DeFrancis. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy (1984), p.56. "To call Chinese a single language composed of dialects with varying degrees of difference is to mislead by minimizing disparities that according to Chao are as great as those between English and Dutch. To call Chinese a family of languages is to suggest extralinguistic differences that in fact do not exist and to overlook the unique linguistic situation that exists in China."

[2] Charles N. Li, Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar (1989), p 2. “The Chinese language family is genetically classified as an independent branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family.”

[3] Jerry Norman. Chinese (1988), p.1. “The modern Chinese dialects are really more like a family of language.

[4] John DeFrancis. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy (1984), p.56. "To call Chinese a single language composed of dialects with varying degrees of difference is to mislead by minimizing disparities that according to Chao are as great as those between English and Dutch. To call Chinese a family of languages is to suggest extralinguistic differences that in fact do not exist and to overlook the unique linguistic situation that exists in China."

[Mair-2] Mair, Victor H. (1991). What Is a Chinese "Dialect/Topolect"? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic Terms (PDF).

[1]

[2]