Veire la font de Ortodoxia

<!--article redigit en provençau-->
{{omon|ortodoxia (omonimia)}}
[[Fichièr:Russian church nice france.JPG|thumb|right|307x307px|La glèisa ortodòxa russa de [[Niça]], en [[Occitània]]]]

L''''ortodoxia''' (del [[grèc (lenga)|grèc]] ὀρθοδοξία, ''orthodoxía'' «opinion dreita»),<ref name="Holt 2012">{{Ref-libre|cognòm=Holt|nom=Andrew|títol=Byzantine Christianity. A: he Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization|an=2012|luòc=[[Chichester, West Sussex]]|publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]]|doi=10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0212|isbn=9780470670606|quote=Byzantine Christianity originated in the [[Byzantine Empire|Eastern Roman Empire]] where it evolved concurrently with the emerging Byzantine state. It was the dominant form of Eastern Christianity throughout the [[Middle Ages]] and during this period [[Eastern Orthodox theology|it developed a complex theological system]] with [[Eastern Orthodox worship|unique spiritual practices]]. Byzantine Christianity's fortunes were in many ways tied to the Byzantine state, because when the empire experienced expansion and heightened influence so did the faith. [...] Although [[Fall of Constantinople|the empire eventually fell]] under the weight of centuries of [[Arab–Byzantine wars|Islamic aggression]], much of Byzantine Christianity has survived in the modern [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox churches]].}}</ref> es una doctrina o ideologia qu'es sostenguda per la [[Glèisa Ortodòxa|Glèisa Catolica Apostolica Ortodòxa]]. Se presenta coma lo {{citacion|cristianisme dins sa plenitud}}: se considèra coma la branca dau cristianisme mai fidèla ais originas de la religion crestiana e mai que mai ai [[Sèt Concilis Ecumenics]] que se tenguèron de [[324]] apC a [[787]] apC, au començament de l'istòria dau cristianisme. Son implantacion es universala, a de seccions importantas dins totei lei partidas dau Mond, pasmens es preponderanta subretot en [[Euròpa Orientala]] e au nòrd d'Asia (mai que mai en [[Grècia]], a [[Chipre]], en [[Macedònia del Nòrd]], [[Bulgaria]], [[Serbia]], [[Montenegro]], [[Romania]], [[Moldàvia]], [[Ucraïna]], [[Bielorussia]], [[Russia]] e [[Georgia (Caucàs)|Georgia]]). Son sèti es lo [[Patriarcat Ecumenic de Constantinòble]], a [[Istambol]].

Un fidèu de la Glèisa Ortodòxa se sòna un '''ortodòxe''' o una '''ortodòxa'''.

== Denominacions ==
[[Fichièr:Eastern-orthodoxy-world-by-country.png|thumb|right|304x304px|Implantacion de l'ortodoxia: es majoritària dins leis estats en roge e reperesenta mai de 10 % de la populacion dins leis estats en jaune.]]
De còps la '''Glèisa Ortodòxa''' la sònan tanben amb d'autrei noms: '''Glèisa Crestiana Ortodòxa''', '''Glèisa Ortodòxa Orientala''' (sa basa istorica es dins l'èst de la Mediterranèa mai es una glèisa d'implantacion  universala), '''Glèisa dei Sèt Concilis''', '''Glèisa Apostolica''', '''Glèisa Crestiana Anciana''', '''Glèisa Ecumenica'''. Mai son nom pus tradicionau e pus formau es '''Glèisa Una, Santa, Catolica e Apostolica''' (aquí cau comprene "Catolica" dins son sens d'origina, çò es "generala, universala") (Ware, p. 307; la formula es contenguda dins lo [[Crèdo de Nicèa]] e se pòt utilizar pereu per designar d'autrei glèisas amb d'autrei tradicions qu'emplegan tanben aqueu crèdo dins sa liturgia).

== Composicion e esquismas ==
La Glèisa Ortodòxa s'organizèt au començament, dins l'[[Empèri Roman]], a l'entorn dei patriarcats d'[[Antiòquia]], [[Jerusalèm]], [[Constantinòble]], [[Alexàndria]] e [[Roma]], e tanben dei Glèisas que se fondèron directament a sa seguida, en inclusent de maniera non exclusiva lei Glèisas d'[[Armenia]], [[Georgia]], [[Russia]], [[Etiopia]] e d'autras, sus la basa dei concilis ecumenics que se succediguèron<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.toc.html Lei Sèt Concilis Ecumenics] Christian Classics Ethereal Library, Calvin College</ref>. 

Leis ortodòxes considèran qu'amb leis [[esquisma]]s successius, l'"ortodoxia" (au sens generau dau mot) coneguèt la sortida:
* Dei glèisas adèptas dau [[nestorianisme]] (nestorians d'Orient), que regetan lo concili d'Efès de [[431]]  
* Dei "Glèisas Ortodòxas Ancianas" o "non calcedonianas", adèptas dau [[miafisisme]] (o mens exactament "monofisisme") e refusant lo concili de Calcedònia de [[451]]; son ara subretot en [[Armenia]], [[Egipte]], [[Etiopia]], [[Eritrèa]], parcialament en [[Siria]] e en [[Índia]].
* De la Glèisa Catolica de Roma, dempuei [[1054]], qu'es adèpta dau [[catolicisme]]. Lo [[Crèdo de Nicèa]], basa de l'ortodoxia e simbòl de la fe, foguèt au centre de l'esquisma amb la Glèisa Catolica en [[1054]] quand aquela d'aquí i introduguèt un element novèu, lo "[[Filioque]]" ("e lo fiu" en latin)<ref>F.L. Cross & E.A. Livingstone, eds., ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church'', 2nd Ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), s.v. "Filioque", p 512.</ref>.
* Dei [[vielhs cresents]], un grop minoritari de Russia, separat en [[1666]]-[[1667]].
* Tanben cau mençonar d'esquismas pus limitats dins lo temps e ara despareguts, coma l'[[arrianisme]] o lo [[donatisme]]... 
Es de notar que lo [[protestantisme]], e mai venga d'una rompedura amb lo catolicisme au sègle XVI, s'es pas unit amb l'ortodoxia.

Dempuei lo sègle XX, pasmens, lo dialòg ecumenic a permés de raprochaments parciaus deis ortodòxes amb lei miafisitas ("monofisitas"), lei protestants e lei catolics.

== Organizacion ==
Lei subdivisions primàrias de la Glèisa Ortodòxa son administrativas e pas teologicas. Se fan segon de diferéncias geograficas, nacionalas e sovent lingüisticas. La glèisa primitiva construguèt sei jurisdiccions segon leis ancians districtes e país romans: ne derivan una part dei subdivisions actualas.

=== Patriarcat Ecumenic de Constantinòble ===

[[Fichièr:Bartolomew I.jpg|200px|thumb|right|[[Bartomieu I]], lo patriarca de Constantinòble a l'ora d'ara]]
Lo [[Patriarcat Ecumenic de Constantinòble]], a [[Istambol]], es l'organisme centrau de l'organizacion de la fe ortodòxa; es establit dempuei l'[[Empèri Bizantin]]. A sa tèsta i a lo patriarca de Constantinòble qu'es lo representant de l'ortodoxia: a l'ora d'ara, es [[Bartomieu I de Constantinòble]]. Aqueu d'aquí es lo menaire legau dins un certan nombre de domenis de la Glèisa Ortodòxa, per exemple pòt consagrar leis evesques e establir de monastèris dins d'autrei districtes canonics. Ansin es eu l'evesque dirècte e lo "menaire Espiritau" dau [[mont Athos]].

Pasmens, lo Patriarcat de Constantinòble s'acòrda amb una organizacion "conciliara" e descentralizada dins l'ensems de l'ortodoxia: consistís en divèrsei glèisas nacionalas que partejan una fe, una istòria, una tradicion e una veneracion comunas mai que se govèrnan caduna amb sei concilis e evesques pròpris: es una diferéncia importanta amb l'autoritat centralizada dau Papat dins lo catolicisme (Timothy Ware, p 23)<ref name="Ware" />.

Au quatren concili ecumenic de Calcedònia, en 441, leis evesques enoncièron lo canon XXVIII que ditz que l'evesque de la "Nòva Roma", valent a dire lo patriarca de Constantinòble, a lo meteis onor que l'evesque de Roma, lo papa, e qu'es encargat d'ordenar lei metropolitans (menaires dau clergat dins de zonas especificas) de Pònt, Asia, Tràcia e atanben leis evesques barbars<ref> Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (Eds) (1900). ''The Seven Ecumencial Councils. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers.'' Second series. Peabody MA: Hendrickson Publishers.  Reprint of original edition published in 1900 By Chas. Scribner & Sons</ref> <ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20031205014144/http://www.piar.hu/councils/ All Ecumenical Councils-All Decrees] vejatz ''Councils 1-7''. Es un sit qu'inclutz lei concilis posteriors au seten concili ecumenic, tau coma lei catolics leis accèptan, en oposicion amb la limitacion ai sèt primiers concilis segon la vision ortodòxa. Lo sit nòta tanben que lo papa Leon acceptèt pas lo canon XXVIII</ref>.

Aquela decision, atribuida a 150 evesques presents au concili, la Glèisa Catolica Romana la contèsta mai fins ara lei Glèisas Ortodòxas mantenon, per definicion, la comunion amb lo Patriarcat Ecumenic de Constantinòble<ref>[http://www.ecupatriarchate.org/ Sit oficiau dau Patriarcat Ecumenic de Constantinòble]</ref><ref name="Ware" />.

A l'ora d'ara, lo sèti materiau dau Patriarcat Ecumenic se tròba dins l'immens [[Collègi Grèc Ortodòxe dau Fanar]], a Istambol, bastit de 1881 a 1883.

=== Patriarcats ancians ===
Au sègle XXI, quatre patriarcats ancians deis originas rèstan intactes (Ware pp. 127, 133 & 134)<ref name="Ware" />.
*'''Lo patriarcat of [[Constantinòble]]''', qu'es tanben lo Patriarcat Ecumenic, sèti generau de l'ortodoxia.
*'''Lo patriarcat d'[[Alexàndria]]''' 
*'''Lo patriarcat d'[[Antiòquia]]''' 
*'''Lo patriarcat de [[Jerusalèm]]''' 

Lo '''patriarcat de [[Roma]]''', qu'existís encara tecnicament a travèrs dau papa e de [[Vatican]], es sortit de l'ortodoxia (segon lo ponch de vista ortodòxe) dempuei lo Grand Esquisma de [[1054]]. Se considèra pas eu meteis coma un patriarcat e donc se vei pas coma l'egau deis autrei patriarcats ancians. 

Lei regions jurisdiccionalas incluson tanben d'autrei divisions autocefalas e autonòmas. Una '''glèisa autocefala''' (''autocefal'' significa {{cita|amb sa tèsta pròpria}}) pòt nommar son evesque (o metropolitan) pròpri e s'autogovèrna. Una '''glèisa autonòma''' (''autonòm'' significa {{cita|amb sa lei pròpria}}) receu un metropolitan o evesque qu'es consagrat (e donc nommat) per una autra jurisdiccion mai totun s'autogovèrna en granda part.

=== Autrei patriarcats ===
*Lo '''Patriarcat d'[[Armenia]]''' o '''Glèisa Apostolica Armènia''' o '''Glèisa Ortodòxa Armènia'''. Per esquisma, sortiguèt de la Glèisa Ortodòxa en [[506]] apC en reaccion còntra lo concili de Calcedònia de [[451]] apC. Aderís au [[miafisisme]] o "monofisisme" ([[Glèisas Ortodòxas Ancianas]]).
*Lo '''Patriarcat de [[Bulgaria]]'''. Lo reconeguèron coma autocefal mai d'un còp a causa dei treviraments qu'anientèron o exilièron lei sòcis de la glèisa a d'ocasions divèrsas. L'autocefalia se reconeguèt d'en primier en [[927]] apC (lei bulgars la declarèron tre [[919]]) e se tornèt crear dos còps, en [[1235]] e en [[1945]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20010425165744/http://bulch.tripod.com/boc/historyen.htm History of the Bulgarian Church]</ref>.
*Lo '''Patriarcat de [[Georgia (Caucàs)|Georgia]]''' o '''Glèisa Ortodòxa Georgiana'''. Fasiá partida au començament dau patriarcat d'Antiòquia. Recebèt l'autocefalia dau patriarca d'Antiòquia en [[466]]. Perdèt son estatut autocefal en 1811 quand lo Sinòde Rus l'absorbiguèt (valent a dire: quand Russia envaïguèt Georgia). Lo retrobèt en [[1943]], autrejat per la Glèisa Ortodòxa Russa e aquò lo Patriarcat Ecumenic o reconeguèt tornarmai en 1989<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070728121453/http://www.patriarchate.ge/istoria/1e.htm History of the Orthodox Church of Georgia]</ref>.
*Lo '''Patriarcat de [[Russia]]''' o '''Glèisa Ortodòxa Russa'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic li autregèt l'autocefalia en [[1589]].
*Lo '''Patriarcat de [[Serbia]]'''. Son estatut autocefal data dau mitan dau [[sègle XIV]], lo perdèt puei e lo li restaurèron au mitan dau sègle [[XVI]].
*Lo '''Patriarcat de [[Romania]]'''. E mai se la Glèisa Ortodòxa de Romania a de racinas que remontan au sègle I apC, es ren qu'en [[1885]] que lo Patriarcat Ecumenic li reconeguèt l'autocefalia.

=== Glèisas autocefalas e autonòmas sens estatut de patriarcat ===
*La '''Glèisa de [[Sinai]]'''. Se centra a l'entorn dau monastèri de Santa Catarina, dins la peninsula de [[Sinai]] en [[Egipte]]. La construccion d'origina èra una capèla qu'indicava lo site que [[Moïses]] i aviá rescontrat Dieu, amb lo Boisson Ardent: es Elena, la maire de l'emperaire bizantin Constantin I, que l'aviá facha bastir. Es l'emperaire Justinian I que faguèt construire lo monastèri entre 527 e 565. La Glèisa de Sinai es autonòma e son archevesque es consagrat per lo patriarca de Jerusalèm (Ware. p. 135)<ref name="Ware" />.
*La '''Glèisa de [[Chipre]]'''. Es autonòma dempuei lo concili d'Efès de 431<ref name="Ware" />.
*La '''Glèisa de [[Grècia]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic reconeguèt son autonomia en 1850 (Ware. p. 136)<ref name="Ware" /><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210309141255/http://www.ecclesia.gr/English/the_church/index.html The Church of Greece]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa de [[Polonha]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic reconeguèt son autonomia en 1924<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071217200431/http://www.orthodox.pl/OrthodoxEng/glowna.htm The Holy Polish Autocephalous Orthodox Church]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa d'[[Albania]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic reconeguèt son autonomia en 1937<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071102065749/http://www.orthodoxalbania.org/English/Brief%20History/BH%20Book4.htm Church of Albania; From 1767 to 1937]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa Ortodòxa dei [[Chequia|Tèrras Chècas]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic reconeguèt son autonomia en 1998<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080215132219/http://www.ekumenickarada.cz/erceng/pravosl.html The Orthodox Church in the Czech Lands]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa Ortodòxa d'[[Eslovaquia]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic reconeguèt son autonomia en 1998.
*La '''Glèisa Ortodòxa en [[America]]'''. Son nom ancian èra Glèisa Russa Ortodòxa Grèga Catolica en America. Es la Glèisa Ortodòxa Russa que li acordèt l'autocefalia en 1970 mai lo Patriarcat Ecumenic o a pas encara reconegut<ref>[http://www.oca.org/Docs.asp?ID=157&SID=12 The Road to Autocephaly 1963-1970]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa Ortodòxa de [[Japon]]'''. Recebèt son autonomia en 1970 au meteis moment que lo patriarca de Russia autregèt l'autocefalia a la Glèisa Ortodòxa en America. Son primat (evesque) es consagrat per lo patriarcat rus<ref>[http://www.oca.org/Docs.asp?ID=157&SID=12 The Road to Autocephaly 1963-1970]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa de [[China]]'''. Consistís en una mission a [[Hong Kong]], que son metropolitan es nommat per lo Patriarcat Ecumenic.
*La '''Glèisa de [[Finlàndia]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic li acordèt l'autonomia en 1923<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071212142650/http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=25813 Finnish Orthodox Church]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa Apostolica Ortodòxa [[Estònia|Estoniana]]'''. Lo Patriarcat Ecumenic li acordèt l'autonomia en 1921 e, après lo periòde d'annexion sovetica, lo li reconeguèt tornar-mai en 1996<ref>[http://www.orthodoxa.org/GB/estonia/documentsEOC/somdocu.htm History of the Orthodox Church of Estonia]</ref>.
*La '''Glèisa Ortodòxa d'[[Ucraïna]]''', ligada au patriarcat rus de Moscòu, que li reconeguèt l'autonomia en 1990. Ara i a tres glèisas en Ucraïna:
**La "Glèisa d'Ucraïna-patriarcat de Moscòu", en comunion amb la Glèisa Ortodòxa [ponch de verificar].
**La "Glèisa d'Ucraïna-patriarcat de Kyiiv", qu'es pas en comunion amb lo corrent principau dei glèisas ortodòxas [ponch de verificar].
**La "Glèisa Autocefala Ortodòxa Ucraïniana", qu'es pas en comunion amb lo corrent principau dei glèisas ortodòxas [ponch de verificar].

=== La Glèisa Ortodòxa en Occitània ===

== Canonicity ==
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = A key term in The Church of the Seven Councils is “Canonical.” The Canons of the Seven Ecumenical Councils established basic beliefs and administrative guidelines. Adherence to these ancient canons is the foundation of a church’s canonical status and thus its interaction with other Orthodox Churches, a state referred to as “in communion.” Canonical churches are “in communion” with each other. Those that are not canonical are removed from the list of those in communion. <ref>[http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/christ/east/eastorth.html Eastern Orthodox Church]</ref> Adherence to the Seven and only the Seven Ecumenical Councils is another distinguishing character of the Orthodox Catholic Church. The Roman Church convened numerous other councils in which the other churches did not participate or vote
 | traduccion = 
}}

== [[Nicene Creed]] ==
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = The [[Nicene Creed]] (also referred to as the '''Nicene-Constantinople Creed''') embodies the fundamental beliefs of the Eastern Orthodox Church. 
:''I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; God of God, Light of Light, true God of true God; begotten, not made, of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made. Who, for us men, and for our salvation, came down from the heavens, and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary, and became man; and was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate; and suffered, and was buried; and arose again on the third day, according to the Scriptures; And ascended into the heavens, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father; and shall come again, with glory, to judge both the living and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life; Who procedeeth from the Father; Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; Who spake by the prophets. In One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. I confess one baptism for the remission of sins; I look for the resurrection of the dead, And the life of the age to come. Amen.''<ref>Prayer Book (1986). Jordanville, New York: Holy Trinity Monastery (page 125) 4th edition</ref>

The Creed is sung or read at every celebration of the '''Eucharist''' and twice daily at '''Midnight Office''' and '''Compline'''. The Nicene Creed, unlke the Apostles Creed or the Athanasian Creed, is the only creed proclaimed by an Ecumenical Council and thus the only creed vested with the authority of the Orthodox Church. The '''Apostles Creed''' is an ancient statement of faith whose use as a Baptismal Creed and inherent teaching is respected by the Orthodox Church but it is never used in Orthodox Service. The '''Athanasian Creed''' is also not used in Orthodox worship services but is occasionally printed out in the '''Book of Hours''' ('''Horologian''') without the Filioque <ref name="Ware" />
 | traduccion = 
}}

=== [[Nicaene Creed|Filioque]] ===
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = The '''Filioque''' represents one of the two greatest differences of opinion between the Orthodox Christian Church and the Roman Catholic Church and arguably led to the Great Schism of 1054. The Latin word ''filioque'' simply means ''from the son''. The opinions expressed today by the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church demonstrate this explicitly in their language which is often couched in the strongest terms.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06073a.htm Dogmatic Meaning of Filioque]</ref><ref> Alexander Kalmiros (1967). Against False Union.  Translated by George Gabriel. Seattle, Washington: St. Nectarios Press</ref> The dispute is also founded upon yet another principle that the Eastern Orthodox Church rejects, the Primacy of the '''Roman Catholic Pope''' (the ultimate authority of what the Eastern Churches often referred to as the '''Latin Church'''), an issue that the Eastern Orthodox Church believes was pointedly resolved at the Fourth Ecumencial Council as worded in Canon XXVIII in which the '''Ecumencial Patriarchate''' was recognised.<ref name=Ostroumoff-1971> Ivan N. Ostroumoff (1971) The History of the Council of Florence. Translated by Basil Popoff Boston: Holy Transfiguration Monastery</ref>

In the 589 A. D. the Synod of Spain at the Third Council of Toledo added “filioque” to a phrase of the Nicene Creed: “Credo ... in Spiritum Sanctum, Dóminum et vivificántem:  qui ex patre ((inserted word)) procedit. Qui cum Patre et Fílio simul adorátur et conglorificátur: qui locútus est per Prophétas.” (“And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father ((and the Son)) who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.”)<ref>[http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/filioque.htm Filioque Controversy]</ref>

The Filioque, simply put, is a dogma in which the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father ''and'' the Son. This diverges from the original creed in which the Spirit is asserted to proceed from the Father exclusively. The issue is a very particular doctrine since the concept of the divinity of the three involves their eternal nature and their one substance--not three but one--and must not imply a beginning, therefore the use of the word ''procedit'' (proceeds). The canonicity of the placement of the word in the creed is disputed on the basis that it was not a term used in the original creed of Nicea nor subsequent amendments in the Seven Councils. Its theological import is such that it indicates a different relationship between the Father and the Son and the Son and the Spirit which is not confirmed by the Scriptures. As such, it is a paramount issue in the beliefs of Orthodox Christians.

The Eastern Orthodox Church recognises only the canons of the Seven Councils while the Roman Catholic Church stipulates canons added after the last of the Seven Councils, notably, in the case of the Filioque, at the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Second Council of Lyons (1274), and the Council of Florence (1438-1445). This last council was declared fully ecumenical by the Latin Church in that the Eastern Orthodox Church had sent representatives. At the time the Greek Empire (Constantinople) was attempting to enrol allies in their conflict with the Ottoman Turks. To this day Roman Catholic sources insist that a reunification of the ancient patriarchates was effected at the Council of Florence <ref>[http://www.catholic.com/library/Filioque.asp Filioque]</ref> Meanwhile, Orthodox sources emphatically insist this was never accomplished. <ref name=Ostroumoff-1971/>
 | traduccion = 
}}

== Apostolic Succession ==
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = 
The [[Orthodox Christian Church]] adheres to the concept of Apostolic Succession. The basic premise of this concept is that the Eastern Orthodox Church hierarchy has a historical heritage of ordination descended directly from the original Apostles. This implies three essential components: a body of beliefs handed down directly from the first followers of Jesus, the Twelve Apostles, (a concept claimed by many other Christian churches who may or may not incorporate the term “Apostolic” in their own title and tend to interpret this in numerous ways); an actual physical succession of ordination of the church hierarchy unlike other churches with the exception of the Anglican Church<ref>[http://www.cinemaparallel.com/apostolic.succession.html Apostolic Succession-A Primer]</ref> and the Roman Catholic Church;<ref>[http://www.catholic.com/library/Apostolic_Succession.asp Apostolic Succession]</ref> and a spiritual lineage. This line of succession therefore dates to the original Twelve Apostles <ref> Note that at the time of the events conveyed in the Acts of the Apostles, [[Judàs Escariòt]] had been replaced by Matthias</ref> without break over a period of nearly 2000 years. 

The primary reference for the Apostolic Succession is found in the New Testament, Matthew 16:13-19. In response to his disciple Peter who states, “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God.” Jesus says, “Blessed are you, Simon bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, there are a number of important concepts that are derived from this passage.; <ref name=Rogers> Fr. Gregory Rogers (1989). Apostolic Succession. Ben Lomond CA: Conciliar Press</ref>
*Jesus clearly states the intention to form a corporate Body, the Church, corporate in the sense that it has a physical form. The believers who hold to the belief stated by Peter are not to be disassociated, disconnected individuals. Believers are to be members of this Church and theirs is a shared faith.
*Peter is a rock upon which the church will be built, metaphorically, the essence of the foundation, Peter, the first stone of the Church’s foundation. St. Paul, in the Letter to the Ephesians (2:20) elaborates on this by saying, “the church has been built on the foundation of the apostles and the prophets, Jesus Himself being the chief cornerstone.” In the Gospel of John, (21:15-23) Jesus also states Peter’s mission (“Feed my sheep”) and he gives Peter the “keys of the kingdom of heaven, again with the authority to bind  on earth what is bound in heaven. While this authority is given to Peter first, it is also given to the other Apostles (John 20:20-23).
*The Rock upon which the Church is built is in fact faith embodied in Peter’s confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God. This refers to the statement that the Orthodox perception is that the Christ Himself, the Truth, is the One upon who the Church is built.

These points are contested by the Roman Catholic Church who believe that Peter is the one and only Rock and therefore authority for God rests with his direct successors in Rome. It also diverges from Protestants and non-denominational Christian’s beliefs which hold that the concept of succession is to all Christians and is wholly spiritual or even metaphorical in that there is no actual physical succession handed down through an elect church hierarchy and therefore, there is no unified corporate body of the Church. There are many interpretations integral to other creeds and denominations which diverged from the original Orthodox doctrine sometime after it was established in the early part of the first millennia A.D.

A paramount premise of Apostolic Succession is that the Christ is the Truth Incarnate, or God made flesh. The concept of Jesus as God and Man is a integral part of the [[Nicaene Creed]] and as such is axiomatic in the Ancient Christian Church. Truth, seen from this perspective is not a body of ideas or a proposition but a physical manifestation, the Christ.<ref name=Rogers/>

The premise of Apostolic Succession also places the authority of church in the priests and bishops who are the teachers fulfilling the sacramental office as the officers of the first true believer, Peter the Disciple. <ref>John Meyendorff et al  (1963) “The primacy of Peter and the Orthodox Church". Bedfordshire, Great Britain: The Faith Press” p. 11. Quoted in Fr. G. Rogers “The Apostolic Succession</ref>

The early church sent leaders to the new Christians (Act 8:14,15) 
*“14. Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
*“15. Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost.”

In this instance the interpretation is that those who heard the Word of God were not a church nor in the Church per se, and having heard the Word of God they had yet to undergo the act of receiving the Holy Ghost. In the doctrine of Apostolic Succession the premise is that though the Christians of Samaria had heard the Word of God, they were still to be administered directly to by the Apostles, in this case, the first generation, those who had been with the Christ in the beginning. The doctrine of Apostolic Succession in this instance draws on the recorded act of actually, physically going to the Christians of Samaria and taking part in their leadership physically as well as spiritually. While they had been baptised they were not physically or spiritually a part of the Church.<ref name=Rogers> Rogers, Gregory (1989) Apostolic Succession. Ben Lamond CA:Conciliar Press</ref>

Earlier Philip, one of the original deacons, had gone to Samaria to preach.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11799a.htm St. Philip the Apostle] There were two Philips in the early Church, one the Apostle and the other a deacon and evangelist referred to in Acts 6:3-6 & Acts 8:5-6 and elsewhere. </ref> Philip, also know as the Evangelist, had been made a deacon (Acts 6:3-6), along with six others who were not of the original Apostles, to serve the business of the church, and tend to the needs of the Christians. He later went to the Gaza desert to speak to the Eunuch (Acts 8:27-39) and then on to Caesarea (Acts 8:40). Apparently Philip was at Samaria at the same time as Peter and John but it is clear that as a deacon and evangelist he had specific roles and the Apostles John and Peter had roles that Philip did not. In other words, deacons could preach and baptise but a bishop, one who was an Apostle or had received the Succession, had to confirm the baptism and pray for them to receive the Holy Spirit. 

'''The process of Apostolic ordination'''

The act of making Philip and the others deacons also provides the doctrine of Apostolic Succession with a precedent in that the Apostles themselves (including Matthias who had replaced Judas Iscariot) ordained the seven deacons personally.

This appointment and ordination and its attendant process and its ultimate goal also provides further definition to the doctrine of Succession. The Apostles had a role to fulfil while members of the community complained that some of their number were not being taken care of. The Christian community at that time was Jewish and they followed the traditions of that faith. The needy in Jewish communities were administered to through the synagogue collections that provided food, the weekly kuppah (basket) and the daily tamhui (tray). The early Christian Church did the same for their community. However, the Greek-speaking Jews felt that the widows were not receiving the daily distribution of food as the Hebrew-speaking widows. This led to discord, which the Twelve Apostles dealt with personally. They directed the main body of disciples to choose seven men to fulfil the required roles so that they would not have to “abandon the word of God to serve tables.”<ref name=BarclayActs> Barclay, Wm. (1976) The Acts of the Apostles (revised edition). Philadelphia: Westminster Press</ref>

The seven men were chosen (Acts 6:5) and the Apostles prayed for them and laid hands on them. The process then included an appointment by the disciples and the subsequent ordination by the Apostles which included the physical act of placing their hands on the heads of the chosen seven (the laying on of hands). The act of physically ordaining and preserving a direct corporeal lineage is supported in a number of instances in the New Testament
*Acts 8:14-19: Peter and John placed their hands on new Christians in Samaria;
*Acts 9:12,17: Ananias places his hands on Saul (later known as Paul the Apostle); 
*Acts 13:2-3: The Apostles lay hands on Barnabas and Saul prior to sending them out;
*Acts 19:6: Paul the Apostle administers the laying on of hands;
*Acts 28:8: Paul the Apostle administers the laying on of hands. 
The physical act of laying on of hands is further mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:14 & 5:22, 2 Timothy 1:5-6 and is listed in the elementary teachings about Christ in Hebrews 6:1-2

Another aspect of act of ordination shows that the Church was in fact developing as a structured institution, consistent with Christ’s commission in Matthew 16:13-19.<ref name=BarclayActs/>

The demarcation between the roles of the administrators and managers was also clear in that the Apostles defined roles for the deacons and roles for the Apostles and they were not the same. These role models are developed through the New Testament. The differences between Philip the Evangelist (one of the ordained deacons in Acts 6:1-7) and the Apostles becomes apparent in later events conveyed in the Acts of the Apostles.

'''Christian and Church'''

The doctrine of Apostolic Succession does not say that one can not be a Christian unless one is in the Apostolic Church.<ref> see for instance the conservative position taken by Pope Benedict [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2056515.ece If it isn’t Roman Catholic then it’s not a proper Church, Pope tells Christians] Times On Line July 11, 2007</ref> It simply does not support the idea found in many non-Catholic communities that they are of the Christian Church. 

A great deal can happen to an individual prior to entering the Church. An individual can experience divine visions, baptism of the Holy Spirit can precede the baptism with water but the presence of an Apostle or one who has received the Succession is still paramount in the act of placing the Christian within the Church.<ref name=Rogers/> A centurion by the name of Cornelius (Acts 10) was instructed in a vision to locate the Apostle Simon Peter. After they met, Simon Peter preached and the centurion and others received the Holy Spirit:
*"While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word."(Act 10:44)
Relative to the doctrine of  Apostolic Succession, an integral aspect of Acts 10 is that the centurion required the intervention of an Apostle to complete the transition into the Church.<ref> This section is also of importance in that it is the clear message that the Gospel be taken to the Gentiles (non-Jews)</ref>

'''Apostolic Commission'''

The Commission inherent in the Apostolic Succession is, simply put, a directive issued by the Christ to the original disciples, sending them out into the world as he had been sent by God the Father. The implications for the role and authority and the responsibility of the Orthodox Clergy are stated in the Book of John Chapter 20, verses 21-23. The Disciples are to “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them, if you retain the sins of any, they are retained”

'''Historical Perspective'''

'''Clement''', the third Bishop of Rome in the first century dealt with the problem of authority in the Church of Corinth specifically referring to the purpose of the Apostolic Succession.<ref>[http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/290.html Clement of Rome] Kiefer, James E. The letter itself does not bear Clement’s name but is referred to some years later in a letter the Church of Corinth wrote to the Church of Rome</ref> Members of the Church had deposed the ordained leaders and Clement reminded them that Apostolic Succession was to provide continuity and prevent strife over the office of the bishop
*1Clem 44:1 And our Apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife over the name of the bishop's office.
*1Clem 44:2 For this cause therefore, having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed the aforesaid persons, and afterwards they provided a continuance, that if these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their ministration. <ref>[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/1clement-lightfoot.html The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians] Lightfoot, J.B. (translator) in Early Christian Writings</ref>

'''Tertullian''', a priest in the Church of Carthage<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14520c.htm Tertullian]</ref> writing in the beginning of the third century referred to the Apostolic Succession to confront heresy (false teachings). Tertullian declared that heresies were to be revealed by the roll of bishops from that day back to the beginning to demonstrate that any Church in question had initially received its commission from an Apostle
“. . . Let them produce the original records of their churches; let them unfold the roll of their bishops, . . . to show for his ordainer and predecessor some one of the apostles or of apostolic men,“ In this passage Tertullian also confirms the Apostolic Succession of Polycarp in the Smyrnaean Church and that of Clement in the Church of Rome.<ref>[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian11.html Prescription Against Heretics] Chapter 32. Holmes, Peter (translator)</ref><ref>[http://www.staycatholic.com/ecf_apostolic_succession.htm The Demurrer Against the Heretics 32] The Early Church Fathers on
Apostolic Succession</ref>

 | traduccion = 
}}

= The Seven Ecumenical Councils =
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = The doctrines of the Eastern Orthodox Church were estabished in seven different ecumencial councils in the first millenium. These doctrinal definitions are, in the eyes of the Orthodox Church, infallible statements of faith and constitute "an abiding and irrevocable authority". <ref name="Ware" /><ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.html The Seven Ecumenical Councils] Schaff, Philip & Wace, Henry (1900). ''The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church: Their Canons and Dogmatic Decrees.'' Online archive. The Canons and the commentaries of the original Seven Ecumenical Councils Includes canons of local synods which have received ecumenical acceptance, Edited by Percival, Henry R.</ref>
 | traduccion = 
}}

= Anathema of 1054 =
{{Traduire
 | còde de lenga = en
 | tèxt original = In 1053, legates were sent by the Roman Catholic Pope Leo IX to negotiate Papal reforms with Patriarch Michael Cerularius in Constantinople. Their leader, Cardinal Humbert, was displeased with their reception and on July 16, 1054 placed a document of Anathema or excommunication on the altar of Hagia Sophia. This document was meant to excommunicate the Patriarch and those who supported him.

'''Anathema''' in this context simply means to accuse another of being wrong and then isolating them or rejecting them, possibly even declaring them accursed (a?a?eµa -- ''anathema''). The Apostle Paul uses the word in '''Galatians''' 1:8 & 9 when he states:
*Gal 1:8 “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be ''accursed''.
*Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be ''accursed''.(KJV).

The rationale for excommunication involved several disagreements between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Pope. These included the removal of the Filioque from the Creed (which was not in any of the versions approved by the Seven Ecumenical Councils), the practice of married clergy (a change brought about by the Roman Church long after the tradition of married clergy had been established in the Western and the Eastern Church) and liturgical practices that diverged from the Roman Church (practices which had a long standing tradition in the Eastern Churches predating the Roman changes by centuries). Patriarch Michael responded by drawing up a list of abuses committed by the Latin Church and issued a '''Bull of Excommunication''' against the Latin Church after a synod of Eastern Orthodox Bishops on July 20 of 1054. This was in turn supported by the other Patriarchates. 

The division, also known as '''The Great Schism''', did not happen all at once. There were earlier disagreements and after 1054, there were any number of issues that simply led to a greater alienation between the two jurisdictions. The Anathema stood for 911 years. In January of 1964, Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras met in Jerusalem, the first time the two leaders had met face to face since the Council of Florence in 1438-39. On December 7, 1965 the Anathemas of 1054 were revoked by the Pope and the Ecumenical Patriarch at the Vatican Council and the Holy Synod respectively (Ware, page 315).<ref name="Ware" /><ref>[http://www.lasvegasorthodox.com/library/history/articles/Schism-The_Great_Schism_of_1054.htm The Great Schism of 1054] St Paul the Apostle Orthodox Church</ref><ref>for a discussion of differences from the perspective of the Latin Church before and after, see [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06073a.htm Filioque]  A.J. Maas (1909) The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VI. Published 1909. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Note the date of the article is more than 50 years prior to the revocation of the Anathema.</ref><ref>[http://www.stjohndc.org/Russian/orthhtrdx/e_P04.htm The Great Schism of 1054] Fr. Victor Potapov, Russian Orthodox Cathedral of St. John the Baptist, Washington, D.C.</ref>
 | traduccion = 
}}

== Referéncias ==
{{Referéncias}}

[[Categoria:Ortodoxia| ]]